Identification and Conclusion Question

Outstanding Excellent Very Good Meets Expectations Below Expectations Well Below expectations
Question 1 (3%)
Identification and Conclusion:
Does your analysis demonstrate the ability to
identify the issues relating to the contract and
discuss them within the relevant context to
reach a conclusion?
Your work clearly states and comprehensively
describes critical aspects necessary to
determine the existence of a contract,
delivering all relevant information necessary for
full analysis of the existence of a contract.
Your work states, describes and clarifies
aspects necessary to determine the
existence of a contract that are
considered critical, so that analysis of
the the existence of a contract is not
seriously impeded by any minor
omissions
Your work states and describes
aspects necessary to determine the
existence of a contract that are
considered critical, but the discussion
lacks the depth,clarity and insights
necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the existence of a contract.
Your work states aspects necessary to
determine the existence of a contract that
are considered critical but your description
leaves some issues unexplored so that
analysis of the existence of a contract is
impeded by the omissions
Your works states some useful aspects
necessary to determine the existence
of a contract, but not always with clear
clarification and/or description
Your work states aspects
necessary to determine the
existence of a contract that are
not critical , often with a lack or
relevant explanation; or this
section of your assignment is
incomplete
Question 2 (6%)
Identification:
Does your analysis demonstrate the ability to
identify the issues relating to the performance
obligation(s) and discuss these issues within the
relevant context (5%)?
Your work demonstrates a highly developed
ability to identify key issues and interrogate
them in detail, within the relevant context.
Your work demonstrates a well
developed ability to identify key issues
and examine them in some detail, within
the relevant context.
Your work demonstrates a developed
ability to identify key issues and
examine them within the relevant
context.
Your work demonstrates a developing
ability to locate key issues and discuss
them within the relevant context.
Your works demonstrates some ability
to identify key issues, but not always
with clear clarification and/or
description
Your work demonstrates little
to no ability to identify the key
relevant issues and your
discussion falls outside the
context that is required for this
assessment; or this section of
your assignment is incomplete.
Conclusion:
Have you pursued your arguments to logical
conclusions regarding the identification of
performance obligation(s) (1%)?
You have provided conclusions that are
comprehensively analysed, and logically
derived from a comprehensive evaluation of
evidence and perspectives in priority order
You have provided conclusions that are
logical and reflect an informed
evaluation and ability to place evidence
and perspectives discussed in priority
order
Your conclusions are logically tied to a
range of information; related
outcomes are identified clearly
Your conclusions are logically tied to
information (because information is
chosen to fit the desired conclusion);
some related outcomes are identified
clearly
Your conclusions are inconsistently tied
to some of the information discussed;
related outcomes are oversimplified
Your conclusions are
unsubstantiated about some
related outcomes
(consequences and
implications), or this section of
the assignment is incomplete
Question 3 (5%)
Identification and conclusion (Mosh Ltd‐JJ Ltd
contract):
Does your analysis demonstrate the ability to
identify the issues and evaluate them within the
relevant context to reach a conclusion (2%)?
Your work clearly states, comprehensively
evaluates and applies critical aspects necessary
to determine the correct transaction price of
the contract, and its correct allocation to the
performance obligation(s)
Your work states, describes and applies
aspects that are considered ciritical to
determine the transaction price, so that
analysis of the transaction price is
impacted by only a minor omission, and
it is correctly allocated to the
performance obligation(s)
Your work states and describes
aspects necessary to determine the
transaction price that are considered
critical, but the analysis lacks the
depth, clarity and insights so that the
calculation of the transaction price is
impeded by omissions; however, it is
correctly allocated to the performance
obligation(s).
Your work states aspects necessary to
determine the transaction price that are
considered critical but your description
leaves some issues unexplored so that the
calculation of the transaction price as well
as its allocation to performance
obligation(s) is impeded by the omissions
Your works states some useful aspects
necessary to determine the transaction
price, but not always with clear
clarification and/or description so that
the calculation of the transaction price
and its allocation to performance
obligation(s) is significantly impeded by
the omissions
Your work states aspects
necessary to determine the
transaction price and its
allocation to performance
obligation(s) that are not
critical, often with a lack of
relevant explanation in the
analysis; or this section of your
assignment is incomplete
Identification and Conclusion (Mel Ltd‐JJ Ltd
contract):
Does your analysis demonstrate the ability to
identify the issues and evaluate them within the
relevant context to reach a conclusion (3%)?
Your work clearly states, comprehensively
evaluates and applies critical aspects necessary
to determine the correct transaction price of
the contract, and its correct allocation to the
performance obligation(s)
Your work states, describes and applies
aspects that are considered critical to
determine the transaction price and
allocate it to performance obligation(s),
so that the analysis is impacted by only
a minor omission
Your work states and describes
aspects necessary to determine the
transaction price and allocate it to the
performance obligation(s) that are
considered critical, but the analysis
lacks the depth, clarity and insights so
that it is impeded by omissions
Your work states aspects necessary to
determine the transaction price and to
allocate it to the performance obligation(s)
that are considered critical but your
description leaves some issues unexplored
so the analysis is impeded by the
omissions
Your works states some useful aspects
necessary to determine the transaction
price and to allocate it to the
performance obligation(s), but not
always with clear clarification and/or
description so that the analysis is
significantly impeded by the omissions
Question 4 (8%)
Analysis:
Does your calculation demonstrate the ability to
identify relevant issues and synthesise them into
adjusting the GAAP profit before tax? (2%)
Organises and synthesises evidence to
comprehensively reveal all critical aspects of
the adjustments to GAAP profit before tax
Organises and synthesises evidence to
reveal critical aspects of the the
adjustments to GAAP profit before tax,
with an understanding of the
adjustments not seriously impeded by
any minor omissions
Organises evidence to reveal
important adjustments to GAAP profit
before tax, but the discussion lacks
depth, clarity and insights necessary
for a comprehensive understanding of
the impact of the adjustments
Organises evidence, but the organisation
is not effective in revealing important
impacts on relevant financial ratios and so
understanding of the impacts on financial
ratios is impeded
Lists evidence, but is is not organised
and/or parts of it are unrelated to the
impacts on relevant financial ratios
Some evidence that is not
critical and/or not relevant is
presented on the impacts on
financial ratios; or this section
of the assignment is
incomplete
Marking Rubric – JJ Ltd Case Study (ACCT7102 Semester 1, 2021)
Analysis:
Does your work demonstrate the ability to
synthesise your own ideas about the pros of non‐
GAAP earnings with those of acknowledged
experts, and to integrate relevant research in
order to strengthen your analysis (2%)?
Relevant information is taken from reputable
academic source(s) with comprehensive
interpretation/evaluation to facilitate the
development of a comprehensive analysis of
the pros associated with preparing non‐GAAP
financial statements
Useful information is taken from
appropriate academic source(s) with
sufficient interpretation/evaluation to
develop a coherent analysis of the pros
associated with preparing non‐GAAP
financial statements
Mostly useful information is taken
from largely appropriate academic
source(s) with adequate
interpretation/evaluation to develop a
generally coherent analysis of the pros
for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Information is taken from source(s) with
some useful interpretation/evaluation, but
more effort is needed to develop a
coherent analysis and/or synthesis of the
pros for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Information is taken from source(s)
with little, if any, useful
interpretation/evaluation of the pros
for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Unsubstantiated conclusions
about the pros for preparing
non‐GAAP financial statements
based on anecdote and
generalisation only, or no
conclusions at all
Analysis:
Does your work demonstrate the ability to
synthesise your own ideas about the cons of non‐
GAAP earnings with those of acknowledged
experts, and to integrate relevant research in
order to strengthen your analysis (2%)?
Relevant information is taken from reputable
academic source(s) with comprehensive
interpretation/evaluation to facilitate the
development of a comprehensive analysis of
the cons associated with preparing non‐GAAP
financial statements
Useful information is taken from
appropriate academic source(s) with
sufficient interpretation/evaluation to
develop a coherent analysis of the cons
associated with preparing non‐GAAP
financial statements
Mostly useful information is taken
from largely appropriate academic
source(s) with adequate
interpretation/evaluation to develop a
generally coherent analysis of the
cons for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Information is taken from source(s) with
some useful interpretation/evaluation, but
more effort is needed to develop a
coherent analysis and/or synthesis of the
cons for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Information is taken from source(s)
with little, if any, useful
interpretation/evaluation of the cons
for preparing non‐GAAP financial
statements
Unsubstantiated conclusions
about the cons for preparing
non‐GAAP financial statements
based on anecdote and
generalisation only, or no
conclusions at all
Conclusion:
Does your work demonstrate a commitment to
intellectual inquiry? Have you pursued your ideas
to possible conclusions (2%)?
Conclusions about the JJ Ltd’s potential
movitation(s) are logical; they reflect an
informed evaluation and ability to prioritise the
importance of evidence and perspectives
discussed
Conclusions are logically tied to a range
of information, including opposing
viewpoints, with JJ Ltd’s potential
motivations clearly identified
Conclusions are mostly logically tied to
relevant information (with one or two
omissions of critical facts), with JJ Ltd’s
key potential motivations mostly
identified
Conclusions are tied to information
(because information is chosen to fit the
desired conclusion), and some of JJ Ltd’s
potential motivations are identified
Conclusions are inconsistently tied to
some of the information discussed
and/or JJ Ltd’s potential motivations
are oversimplified
Conclusions are not tied to the
information discussed and/or JJ
Ltd’s potential motivations are
not discussed
Effective writing skills (3%)
Structure and Referencing (1%) Shows a polished, professional approach to the
topic. Written work is logically sequenced and
paragraph struture is without error.
Referencing is complete and accurate.
Carefully and logically organised, with a
consistently sound paragraph structure.
Referencing is usually
accurate/complete, with one or two
minor oversights.
Shows organisation and coherence,
with mostly minor errors in paragraph
structure. Referencing is mainly
accurate and complete, with some
errors.
Though there are a few minor and/or
major errors in paragraph structure, there
has been a genuine attempt to organise
most aspects of the work. Referencing is
included but some details are missing
and/or references overlooked.
Inconsistent efforts to organise work,
with consistent errors in paragraph
structure. Referencing is included but
significant details and references are
missing.
Disorganised/incoherent work
reflecting a lack of structure.
Referencing is absent and/or
unsystematic.
Clarity of expression (1%) Fluent writing style appropriate to document.
Grammar and spelling accurate.
Language is fluent. Grammar and
spelling is mostly accurate, with the
occasional minor error.
Language is mainly fluent. Some minor
and the occasional major errors in
grammar and/or spelling (but meaning
is still clear).
Meaning apparent, but language not
always fluent. Grammar and/or spelling
contain errors which sometimes impede
the reader.
Meaning unclear and/ or grammar
and/or spelling contain errors which
impact on fluency/readability.
There are many spelling and
grammatical errors that
significantly and consistently
impact on fluency/readability.
Effective Written Communication (clear
connection between research and practice)
(1%)
Demonstrates skilful use of high quality,
credible, relevant sources to develop ideas
relevant to the incentives to prepare non‐GAAP
financial statements that are appropriate for
the genre of a written case report
Demonstrates consistent use of credible
sources to support ideas relevant to the
motives to prepare non‐GAAP financial
statements that are situated within the
genre of a written case report
Demonstrates a genuine attempt to
use relevant sources to support ideas
that are appropriate for the genre of a
written case study report
Uses a range of sources to support some
relevant ideas within the genre of a
written case report
Has struggled to support most ideas
with credible sources relevant to the
motives to prepare non‐GAAP financial
statements that are situated within the
genre of a written case study report
Demonstrates little, if any,
evidence of credible sources
being consulted and/or the
sources being relevant to the
assignment set

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Identification and Conclusion Question
Just from $9/Page
Order Essay
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via +1 817 953 0426

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code STARS