Home » Pareto Optimality and Multiple Choices

Pareto Optimality and Multiple Choices

Quiz 1 August 13, 2017

Multiple Choice

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Pareto Optimality and Multiple Choices
Just from $9/Page
Order Essay

Question 1. Pareto Optimality:

a. Pareto optimal outcomes never involve any person’s least preferred outcome

b. Some pareto optimal outcomes may be pareto improvements over other pareto optimal outcomes

c. Pareto optimality arises from a principle based on making some better off while hurting others

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

g. none of the above

Question 2. Individualist ethics would agree that:

a. Good social choices derive from properties of the individuals in that society

b. Justice in society can be defined without reference to any individual

c. Utilitarianism is the only ethical principle that is invidualist

d. Pareto Opimality is an individualist ethical principle

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

g. both a. and d.

Question 3. A social choice function:

a. May take as input information about agents

b. Chooses the best or right outcomes from among all possible outcomes

c. Usually has access to less information than institutions

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

 

 

quiz 1 2

Question 4. Kaldor-Hicks improvements:

a. Focuses on finding ways to improve the outcome for some individuals

b. Does not allow individuals who gain to compensate those who loose

c. Are always Pareto improvements

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

Question 5. Contractualism:

a. Attempts to justify ethics using a thought experiment

b. Proves utilitarianism is the only correct ethical framework

c. Places an emphasis on what people will agree to when determining what is ’good’

d. both b. and c.

e. both a. and c.

f. both a. and b.

Question 6. Welfarism:

a. Attempts to use objectively true preferences to determine what is best

b. Varies from individualist to weakly individualist

c. Allows only ordinal utility to be used (rules out cardinal approach)

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

Question 7. Utilitarianism

a. Never justifies hurting others or lowering their utility

b. Allows clear costs and benefits

c. Cannot be based on subjective preferences

d. both a. and c.

e. both b. and c.

f. both a. and b.

 

 

quiz 1 3

Short Answer

Answer all of the following 6 questions.

Question 8. Alice and Bob are trying to decide where to eat there prefer- ences are illustrated by the following table:

Chipotle Five Guys Wendy’s Taco Bell

Alice 10 9 7 1

Bob 9 12 10 3

Bob argues that Wendy’s would be the right social choice, but Alice disagrees that it is a good social choice. Explain what Alice’s arguement might be first using an ordinal utility approach and then using a cardinal utility approach.

Question 9. Alice and Bob are splitting a pizza with 8 slices. Illustrate the social budget constraint. Show and explain at least one of the Rawlsian and utilitarian indifference curves and label the socially optimal allocations.

Question 10. Explain the thought experiment that is used to justify con- tractual ethics. Explain one arguement about what social choice framework people would choose behind the veil.

 

 

quiz 1 4

Question 11. Draw and label the model of institutions we have been dis- cussing.

Question 12. Compare and contrast consequentialism and the Rights/Justice approaches. What are the key differences, can the two approaches sometimes justify the same outcomes as being ’good’?

Question 13. Draw a social budget constraint with production for Alice and Bob. Label where the pareto optimal allocations are on your graph, and pick one feasible allocation and explain why it is or isn’t Pareto optimal.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via +1 817 953 0426

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.
  +1 (301) 710 0002           + 44 161 818 7126           [email protected]
  + 44 161 818 7126         [email protected]