Home » Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Essay


Essay #2 – Rhetorical Analysis Essay The following are major guidelines for this assignment. When you don’t meet the minimum, points are deducted. Please make sure you have followed each and every instruction below for this assignment in order to get the grade you deserve. Page Length: at least 3 pages, no more than 3.5. The separate Works Cited page does not count toward the total. You do not need a separate cover page (less than 3 pages reduces your grade by at least 5 points) Format: New Times Roman, 12pt font, double spaced, MLA pagination, title (proper capitalization and spacing). Double Space every sentence with no extra spaces in between paragraphs.You can find examples of intext citations and Works Cited page information everywhere. Try Owl Purdue Writing Center. Any variation from these format rules reduces your grade by 5 points. Nowhere in your essay should you use the phrase, “I will be discussing” or “In conclusion”. The tone and person of your essay is 3rd person, always, unless it is humanely impossible! Introduction: Recall the introduction format from the “How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay” document in Getting Started. Remember, your thesis is about the writing strategy of the author or authors. It is not about how YOU feel about the specific topic. Underline your thesis statement. Body Paragraphs: Your body paragraphs will be about each main point or strategy you identified in the article you chose. Identify each of your main points/writing strategy and support each one with text from the article. Connect your chosen strategy (main point) with the Elements of the Rhetorical Situation, which include authors, topic, audience, purpose, and occasion in an organized fashion; tying some of these elements to each specific main point from your article is a priority. Intext Citations: You should have at least 3-6 in-text citations (most of these will be direct quotations). No quotation will be longer than 1 sentence and must have a citation at the end. You must include a properly formatted Works Cited page. It must be formatted correctly or there goes another 5 points. Indent all new paragraphs’ first sentence at least 5 spaces. Conclusion: Take a look at your introduction. Rewrite, rephrase, and renew your thesis sentence recalling the authors’ aim (purpose) for using the specific Rhetorical Strategies to persuade their specific audiences. Your commentary can be utilized within this paragraph. Edited and proofread: For grammar, syntax, diction and including punctuation, spelling, capitalization, pronouns, verbs, etc.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Just from $9/Page
Order Essay

Federal judge strikes down Trump plan to slash food stamps for 700,000 unemployed Americans


Spencer S. Hsu

Oct. 18, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. EDT

A federal judge on Sunday formally struck down a Trump administration attempt to end food stamp benefits for nearly 700,000 unemployed people, blocking as “arbitrary and capricious” the first of three such planned measures to restrict the federal food safety net.

In a scathing 67-page opinion, Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell of D.C. condemned the Agriculture Department for failing to justify or even address the impact of the sweeping change on states, saying its shortcomings had been placed in stark relief amid the coronavirus pandemic, during which unemployment has quadrupled and rosters of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program have grown by more than 17 percent, with more than 6 million new enrollees.

The rule “at issue in this litigation radically and abruptly alters decades of regulatory practice, leaving States scrambling and exponentially increasing food insecurity for tens of thousands of Americans,” Howell wrote, adding that the Agriculture Department “has been icily silent about how many [adults] would have been denied SNAP benefits had the changes sought . . . been in effect while the pandemic rapidly spread across the country.” The judge concluded that the department’s “utter failure to address the issue renders the agency action arbitrary and capricious.”

Howell’s ruling granted summary judgment to a coalition of 19 states, D.C., New York City and private groups that sued to stop the new rule, finalized in December, to eliminate states’ discretion to waive work requirements in distressed economic areas.

Howell temporarily enjoined the proposal on March 13, the same day President Trump declared the coronavirus outbreak a national emergency. Congress then waived the requirement for the duration of the emergency as part of economic relief legislation, and the Trump administration suspended its planned April implementation date.

However, the Agriculture Department appealed the judge’s earlier order, and absent court intervention the rule would have taken full effect at the end of the state of emergency. Spokesmen for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


In a statement, New York Attorney General Letitia James called the decision “a win for common sense and basic human decency,” adding that the rule “would have not only made it harder for thousands to feed their families and risk them going hungry, but would have exacerbated the public health crisis we face and the economic recession we are still in the midst of under President Trump.”

Subtitle Settings


Font Size Font Edge Font Color Background

Democrats slam ‘Trump virus response’ as president’s surrogates defend him

Trump and Biden campaign surrogates traded blame over the administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic on Oct. 18. (Zach Purser Brown/The Washington Post)

14 states, D.C. and New York City sue to stop Trump plan to slash food stamps for 700,000 unemployed people

Attorneys general from D.C., Maryland, Virginia, New York, California and numerous other states alleged that the change — to slash nearly $5.5 billion from food stamp spending over five years — would require “drastic cuts” for adults without children, ignored local labor market conditions and was based on no evidence.

States are in the best position to evaluate local economic circumstances and the effectiveness of work requirements, they argued, warning against the elimination of “essential food assistance for benefits recipients who live in areas with insufficient jobs.”


Able-bodied adults without dependents, between the ages of 18 and 49, can receive benefits for a maximum of three months during a three-year period, unless they are working or enrolled in an education or training program for 80 hours a month.

States have been able to waive this time limit to ensure access to food stamps during the ups and downs of reentering the workforce. Before this rule, counties with an unemployment rate as low as 2.5 percent were included in waived areas.

Trump administration tightens work requirements for SNAP, which could cut hundreds of thousands from food stamps

The new rule would have tightened the criteria for states applying for such waivers, making 6 percent the minimum unemployment rate for a county to receive a waiver.

In announcing the change last year, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said it was “about restoring the original intent of food stamps . . . moving more able-bodied Americans to self-sufficiency.”


Perdue cited the economic expansion as a basis for tightening states’ waivers. He said the number of Americans receiving benefits under SNAP has grown from 17 million to more than 36 million since 2000, although the unemployment rate was lower at the time.

Two other proposed rule changes, not yet final, aim to cap deductions for utility allowance and to limit access to SNAP for working poor families.

A study by the Urban Institute indicated the combined impact of these rules would cut 3.7 million people from SNAP in an average month. Benefits would be reduced for millions more, and 982,000 students would lose automatic access to free or reduced-price school meals.

Trump proposal would push 3 million Americans off food stamps

An experiment requiring work for food stamps is a Trump administration model

Senate GOP won’t extend pandemic food stamps but doubles ‘three-martini lunch’ deduction


Spencer Hsu

Spencer S. Hsu is an investigative reporter, two-time Pulitzer finalist and national Emmy Award nominee. Hsu has covered homeland security, immigration, Virginia politics and Congress. Follow


Get professional assignment help cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.

Why choose our academic writing service?

  • Plagiarism free papers
  • Timely delivery
  • Any deadline
  • Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
  • Subject-relevant academic writer
  • Adherence to paper instructions
  • Ability to tackle bulk assignments
  • Reasonable prices
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Get superb grades consistently



Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via +1 817 953 0426

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.
  +1 (301) 710 0002           + 44 161 818 7126           [email protected]
  + 44 161 818 7126         [email protected]