This article was originally published on Common Edge.
Architecture lost itself in an identity crisis not long ago. The discipline wandered in self-reflection,
reexamining how practitioners go about their work, how the built environment should appear, and
why. Movements came and went. Promising paths dead-ended. Eventually, the profession gave up
looking for ways out of its uncertainty, leaving us where we are today.
In premodern eras, new construction techniques, evolving opinions on art, and shifting societal beliefs
drove styles. Advances were slow, but once established, became long-lived norms. The Gothic period
lasted four centuries, the Renaissance three. From the nineteenth century on, though, more than a
hundred aesthetic and philosophical movements lived quickly and died. As historian Charles Jencks
notes, there were “a plurality of live architectural traditions” even during the International Style’s
forty-year hegemonic heyday.
The century of robust mini-debates on form and function, meaning and intent, petered out ten years
ago. Evidence that contemporary theory and practice are threads of new architectural thought is
scarce. Arcade magazine published a survey of architectonic declarations and mapped thirty modern
movements from 1900 to 1960, and eighty more between 1960 and 2010. At 2015, they found only two.
For reasons unknown, the formation of new isms dwindled—but certainly, not because architecture
has found itself. One possibility could be fear. Taking a public stand against the status quo comes with
risks of ridicule and professional harm. In extreme cases, even physical danger. In 1957, Mao Zedong’s
appealed to China’s intelligentsia for a constructive philosophical debate. He said, “Letting a hundred
flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend is the policy for promoting progress in the
arts and the sciences and a flourishing socialist culture in our land.” It turned out to be a ploy to flush
out dissenters. Many took the bait and were reeled in. The other possibility for the scarcity of new
thinking is that architects don’t give a damn. I prefer to think that architects have ideas but don’t know
how to toss them into the flows of current (albeit limited) discourse. No matter why, though, the result
is that the dominant architectural style today is a nondescript banality underpinned by minimal
debate.
There are, of course, exceptions, and it is through them that we find a way out of the woods. I present
herewith a means of reinvigorating the profession’s search for self.
When, in 2008, Patrik Schumacher of Zaha Hadid Architects penned a treatise proclaiming
“Contemporary avant-garde architecture is addressing the demand for an increased level of
articulated complexity,” and that “Parametricism is the great new style after modernism,” and further
stating, “Postmodernism and Deconstructivism have been transitional episodes,” he was following a
well-trod path to artistic innovation: the manifesto. Note the similarity between Schumacher’s rhetoric
and Walter Gropius’ 1965 assertion about the International Style:
A breach has been made with the past, which allows us to envisage a new aspect of architecture
corresponding to the technical civilization of the age we live in; the morphology of dead styles has
been destroyed.
Schumacher claimed to have found a demand for “articulated complexity” and answered the call to
action. He beckoned others to join him. Gropius saw civilization growing more technical, prompting
him also to respond. We heeded the wants of our age, each man effectively said, and—Eureka!—found
a better way. Both demanded Out with the old and in with the new. Both telegraphed Revolt! by
channeling Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ 1848 call for a “revolutionary movement against the
existing…order of things.” Gropius and Schumacher might well have written, Working architects of all
countries, unite!
By definition, the avant-garde is new. Surprise ensues when radical ideas burst on the scene, bringing
confusion and questions. In art as in politics, answers are often provided via declarations called
manifestos. Unique strategies cannot be judged without context, so pronouncements generally
provide a preamble, complaint, and a list of tenets. Reduced to writing, if a premise resonates, it has a
chance of becoming a movement à la Neoclassicism, Modernism, Metabolism, Postmodernism,
Deconstructivism. A Whateverism never codified goes nowhere.
The dearth of contemporary architectural movements indicates the profession is no longer
questioning itself—and that’s a problem. The built environment has no end of problems in need of
theories on how to respond, paramount being the existential threat of climate change.
Architecture’s first declaration of intent was arguably Vitruvius’ Ten Books on Architecture, written in
27 BC. But the idea of a publishing sets of core beliefs didn’t reach its stride until The Communist
Manifesto. That slim pamphlet became the template for numerous public proclamations, many
incorporating a version of, “It is high time that [ADHERENTS’ NAME] should openly, in the face of the
whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies.” The introductions of Futurism, Cubism,
Vorticism, Constructivism, Dada and Surrealism, De Stijl, and the Bauhaus owe much to Marx and
Engel.
Arcade magazine found more than a hundred architectural manifestos published over the last one
hundred years. Some of them reduced their argument to a single page or poster. Others were long-
form texts. Among the more notable are Frank Lloyd Wright’s The Art and Craft of the Machine in
1901, Ornament and Crime (Adolf Loos, 1913), Towards a New Architecture (Le Corbusier, 1965), The
Death and Life of Great American Cities (Jane Jacobs, 1961), Complexity and Contradictions in
Architecture (Robert Venturi, 1966), and Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth(Buckminster Fuller,
1968).
Mies van der Rohe wrote a manifesto. So did Philip Johnson, Louis Kahn, Paolo Soleri, Christopher
Alexander, Rob Krier, Renzo Piano with Richard Rogers, Kisho Kurokawa, Aldo Rossi, Daniel Libeskind,
Rem Koolhaas, Coop Himmelblau, Steven Holl, and Bjarke Ingels. Reader, if you’re an architect, are
you on the list? If not, why not? Conventional wisdom assumes lucid thinking behind the largest and
most permanent of humankind’s built works. One would like to believe that architects’ decisions on
aesthetics and art, function and form, economy and sustainability are the result of well-considered
and defensible rationales. At the least, designs should be based on opinions that can be coherently
stated.
Looking around at today’s built environment suggests it ain’t so. I’d venture asking most
contemporary architects to name their theory, describe their design philosophy, or recite what
principles motivate their work would yield befuddled answers or blank stares. I am not alone in this
opinion. Few “in the contemporary profession [are] willing to take a stand, to mount a soapbox and
exclaim a polemical notion,” wrote Michael Holt and Marissa Looby in a 2011 Domusmagazine op-ed.
The take-away is that today’s architects have little to say about what they design and why.
Let’s change that. Let us all write a manifesto. I’ll go first, guided by the wisdom of Dr. Anna Tahinci, a
professor and art history chair of the Museum of Fine Art Houston’s Glassell School of Art who teaches
a workshop entitled, Write Your Own Manifesto!, based on MFAH’s 2015 exhibition, Violence and
Precision: Artists’ Manifestos.
The French poet Tristan Tzara wrote in his 1918 Dadaist manifesto, “To launch a manifesto, you have to
want: A, B, & C, and fulminate against 1, 2, & 3.” According to Dr. Tahinci, three steps are taken:
One: Designate an enemy and chronicle a fervent (and somewhat limited) history of persecution
leading up the climactic moment of rupture.
For my manifesto, this will be easy. I find no end of problem buildings in Houston (my home town),
including contemporary examples designed by God architects of our time. My issue isn’t with their
beauty, for many are pretty. Nor is my problem function, for, as far as I know, they work as intended.
My criticism is the same I have with many contemporary buildings—they seem arbitrary and
capricious, as if no guiding principle rooted them into existence. Even when there is stated rationale, it
is often glib, or invisible in the work, or based on a theoretical position that time has invalidated.
Take, for instance, the architecture of Houston’s museum district, populated with well-regarded
buildings of brand name design firms. William Ward Watkin designed the Museum of Fine Art
Houston’s original Neoclassical building in 1924. Kenneth Franzheim added a small wing in 1952. Mies
van der Rohe designed a free-spanning addition in 1958 and another International Style expansion in
the late 60s, shortly before his death. Rafael Moneo produced a modernist building in 2000, and Steven
Holl completed a new Glassell School of Art in 2018 that replaced a 1979 Brutalist building by Gene
Aubry. Down the street from MFAH’s campus is Venturi Scott Brown’s children’s museum, constructed
in 1992.
I can’t pick a fight with Watkin, who delivered a classical building at a time when Neoclassicism and
museums were joined at the hip. Nor can I argue against Mies’ 1958 example of universal space, given
Modernism’s at-the-time honorable promise that form following function would lead to an egalitarian
society of light and air. By the time of his death, however, Mies should have known his version of the
Industrial Age wasn’t living up to his ideals. Instead of serving the common good, the International
Style had sold out to Big Business, the antithesis of what should house a cultural institution.
Rafael Moneo’s big box looks like a department store, so its meaninglessness is worth knocking.
Steven Holl borrowed shapes from Isamu Noguchi’s wonderful 1986 sculpture garden, which abuts the
new Glassell School. Meaning received. Unfortunately, and despite Holl saying in his Five Minute
Manifesto, “More than a mere ingredient in a building’s conception, a SITE is both its Physical and
Metaphysical Foundation,” the new Glassell’s plaza does severe damage to Noguchi’s work. What had
been a destination, a secluded courtyard, an intimate sanctuary to contemplate art, is now an open
passageway to somewhere else. The magic is gone.
Venturi Scott Brown’s Children’s Museum of Houston is the best of the bunch. It’s a playful Postmodern
period piece that riffs off Neoclassicism without also ripping it off. Although PoMo was flawed, I don’t
have it in my heart to ding the building. VSB was more faithful to the movement’s goal of reconnecting
architecture to its history than most Postmodern buildings, and much better than attempts to revive
the movement as Neo-PoMo.
I, therefore, declare Pritzker Prize winner Rafael Moneo, and AIA Gold Medal winners Mies van der Rohe
and Steven Holl enemies of my state of mind.
Two: List demands and declarations in response to wrongdoings.
For me, there is no more pressing need than for architecture to reassert itself as “the great book of
humanity,” as Victor Hugo urged. I call for re-establishing buildings as houses of societal
metanarratives. I yearn for architecture as gentle influencers that nudge, shape, and reinforce positive
behaviors. I want a Persuasive Architecture, not voiceless aesthetic gestures, inconsiderate form-
making, and unintelligible architectural gymnastics. I ask that architects take on the anthropogenic
calamities of war, poverty, hunger, preventable disease and death, intolerance, illiteracy, and climate
change.
Three: Antagonize a group and pit “us” against “them” in an aggressive call for action.
Marx and Engels wrote, “A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism.” Them were the
capitalists (the bourgeoisie); us was the public (the proletariat).
Dr. Tahinci encourages manifesto authors to employ this same we-speak and make us-against-them
demands for action. Don’t be shy. Over-the-top isn’t over the top in manifesto writing. Outrage and
anger are not out of place, either. Quirky and crazed is not only acceptable; it’s preferable. Shock has
value, so make generous use of exclamation points in your writing. Feel free also to scream in ALL
CAPS.
Other tricks of the trade include listing your demands, bold typography, the use of storytelling with a
dose of drama, even theatrics. Do (almost) anything to get attention and command an audience. One
art student reportedly presented his “man”-ifesto in the nude with beliefs and opinions written on his
skin. Yes, he received an A for the assignment.
To that I offer a more modest polemic:
PERSUASIVE-ism
Architects of the world, WAKE UP!
Humanity’s greatest problems are anthropogenic, not architectural
CAST OFF THE YOKE OF MEANINGLESSNESS!
***
As civilization faces a human-made END OF TIME,
Beautiful boxes have become IRRELEVANT.
And form for form’s sake is IRRESPONSIBLE.
They who reproduce Classicism belong to ANOTHER TIME.
They who promulgate the International Style have LOST THEIR WAY.
They who reintroduce Postmodernism will MISS THE POINT.
***
Buildings are OPPORTUNITIES to CHANGE THE WORLD!
A NEW architecture IS NEEDED—an architecture of CHANGE AGENT.
***
We REJECT architecture as fashion statements and me-too knockoffs.
We REJECT buildings as illiterate objects.
We REJECT buildings as empty sculptural gestures.
We DEMAND built environments overtly address critical issues.
We DEMAND architecture that positively influences what people do.
***
RESTORE ARCHITECTURE TO THE GREAT BOOK OF HUMANITY!
That’s it; that’s my soapbox, my criticism of contemporary architecture with suggestions for a new
direction. In poster form, my rant looks like this:
Yeah, admittedly, PERSUASIVE-ism needs work—but hey, how’s yourmanifesto coming along?
Architecture’s historical progression—from a thought to a theory, to a movement, to a manifesto, to an
accepted style—has stalled. We can restart evolution, but only if architects put their thinking caps back
on, force themselves to decide on what they believe, and publish their thoughts in direct and
straightforward terms. There are numerous go-byes to guide us out of the forest.
“We are on the extreme promontory of the centuries!” wrote Filippo Tommaso Marinetti in The Futurist
Manifesto (1909). “What is the use of looking behind at the moment when we must open the
mysterious shutters of the impossible? Time and Space died yesterday.” Naum Gabo and Antoine
Pevsner declared in the Basic Principles of Constructivism (1920), “We are no longer content with the
static elements of form in plastic art. We demand the inclusion of time as a new element and assert
that real movement must be employed in plastic art, in order to make possible the use of kinetic
rhythms in a way that is not merely illusionistic.”
Dr. Tahinci encourages architects to publish their opinions, motives, intentions, and meaningful and
assertive concepts. That’s a superb recipe for food for thought, and since architecture is hungry for
ideas, an excellent idea for a competition.
ANNOUNCING THE COMMON EDGE ARCHITECTURAL MANIFESTOS CONTEST!
Write or draw what you feel and email what you think to [email protected]. Attach a Microsoft
Word file of 150 words or less if submitting as prose, or a poster in JPEG format 1,280 pixels wide by
1,656 pixels tall. Common Edge will publish the best manifestos online. You never know, your
viewpoint might go viral.
Let a hundred manifesti bloom.
Suggested Reading
The Communist Manifesto (1848), by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles Programs and Manifestoes
on 20th-Century Architecture (1975), by Ulrich Conrads
Manifesto: A Century of Isms (2001), by Mary Ann Caws
Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture (2006), by Charles Jencks and Karl Kropf
News Articles Common Edge
#TAGS
Cite: Richard Buday. “How to Write an Architectural Manifesto” 26 Jul 2019. ArchDaily. Accessed 26 Oct 2020.
<https://www.archdaily.com/921760/how-to-write-an-architectural-manifesto> ISSN 0719-8884
Powered by Disqus
3 Comments ArchDaily 🔒 Disqus’ Privacy Policy Login”1
t Tweet f Share Sort by Newest
LOG IN WITH OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS
Name
Join the discussion…
?
Rob • a year ago
• Reply •
Personally I thought that manifesto was pretty good. I might just borrow it if that’s okay. △ ▽
Richard Buday, FAIA • a year ago
• Reply •
> Rob
Ok by me. △ ▽
rktrixy • a year ago
• Reply •
Interesting. Just when I was enjoying the quiet, the lack of screaming bombast if you will, you lay out some good reasons to pick up the flag and carry it forward.
That said, I had to laugh at the picture. I’ve always imagined what the people in the painting are saying. With apologies to the entire nation of France and the memory of those who died for freedom, as well as the artist.
△ ▽
Subscribe✉ Add Disqus to your sited Do Not Sell My Data⚠
Recommend)
Share ›
Share ›
Share ›
ArchDaily Articles How to Write an Architectural Manifesto
How to Write an Architectural Manifesto
Bookmarked
Written by Richard Buday July 26, 2019
Richard Buday Author
FOLLOW
About this author
MORE ARTICLES
More Articles »
Architecture and Nature: A Framework for Building in Landscapes
Pavilions in Cities: 10 Structures that Foster Human Interactions
Exploring The New Vernacular That Will Emerge as a Response to Climate Change
MOST VISITED
R Micro Housing / Simple Projects Architecture
Villa K / Marion Regitko Arquitectos + Igloo Design
Bamboo Formwork and Exposed Concrete in Architectural Projects
MOST VISITED PRODUCTS
Hidden Panel Fastener – Standard Range|Fastmount®
Building Performance Platform|cove.tool
Lamp – PH 5 + PH 5 Mini|Louis Poulsen
FREE SHIPPING + RETURNS
Support ArchDaily’s Mission Share your idea or submit your project.
SUPPORT
Work at ArchDaily Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Policy RSS
© All rights reserved. ArchDaily 2008-2020 ISSN 0719-8884 All images are © each office/photographer mentioned.
BROWSE THE CATALOG
BRICKS
Randers Tegl
Facing Bricks – Ultima RT 162
METAL PANELS
Dri-Design
Metal Panels – Perforated Imaging
FIBER CEMENTS / CE…
Swisspearl
Swisspearl Fiber Cement Roof Panels
BRICKS
Randers Tegl
Facing Bricks – Ultima RT 155
FIBER CEMENTS / CE…
EQUITONE
Fiber Cement Facade Panel Pictura
WOOD
Lunawood
Interior Thermowood
SKYLIGHTS
VELUX Commercial
Atrium Longlight, DZNE Germany
EXTERIOR DECKING
Lunawood
Thermowood Decking
METAL PANELS
RHEINZINK
Panel Systems – Horizontal Panel
WALL / CEILING LIGHTS
Alcon Lighting®
Garage Lighting – Remy
METAL PANELS
RHEINZINK
Seam Systems – MULTI-FORM
WORK CHAIRS
Interstuhl
Chairs – SHUFFLEis1 Chair System
More products »
Save the content you like using this button.
Got it
Projects Products & BIM Folders News
Search ArchDaily
Submit a Project Advertise
the world’s most visited architecture website
World m.k.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
GET A PERFECT SCORE!!! 
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more