Home » Your Guide to Understanding and Using Analytics

Your Guide to Understanding and Using Analytics

June 11, 2013
Framing the Problem
From Keeping Up with the Quants: Your Guide to
Understanding and Using Analytics
By Thomas H. Davenport and Jinho Kim
(A Harvard Business Review Press Book)
© 2013 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved.
Harvard Business Publishing distributes in digital form the individual chapters from a wide selection of books on business from
publishers including Harvard Business Press and numerous other companies. To order copies or request permission to
reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685 or go to http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise – without the permission of Harvard Business Publishing, which is an
affiliate of Harvard Business School.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem
While there are many different types of quantitative analysis, they
all have certain key features and steps in common. As we noted in
chapter 1, a quantitative analysis follows the following three stages
and six steps:
• Problem recognition
• Review of previous findings
• Modeling and variable selection
• Data collection
• Data analysis
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
• Results presentation and action
In this chapter and chapters 3 and 4, we’ll describe each stage and
step individually, and provide a couple of examples of quantitative
analyses that cover all six steps, but feature the particular stage of
analysis being discussed in the chapter. At the end of each of the three
chapters we’ll lay out two examples—generally one from business and
one involving society in general or personal experience—that illustrate how all six steps were employed in an analysis, but again focus in
particular on one stage of the analysis. Our three-stage, six-step
process isn’t the only way to do analytics (for example, there is a Six
Sigma methodology for analyzing variation in product quality yielding
no more than 3.4 defects per million products produced), but we expect that most analytical experts would agree with it, and it’s broad
enough to encompass a lot of different types of business problems and
The Problem Recognition Step
A quantitative analysis starts with
recognizing a problem or decision
and beginning to solve it. In decision
analysis, this step is called framing,
and it’s one of the most critical parts
of a good decision process. There are
various sources that lead to this first
step, including:
• Pure curiosity (common
sense, observation of events)
1. Problem recognition
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 25
• Experiences on the job
• Need for a decision or action
• Current issues requiring attention (of a person, an organization, or a nation)
• Building on, or contesting, existing theories or past research
• Accepting of project offers or determining availability funding
Note that at this step, the analytics are yet to come. The decision
to forge ahead with some sort of analysis may be driven by a hunch or
an intuition. The standard of evidence at this point is low. Of course,
the whole point of a quantitative analysis is to eventually apply some
data and test your hunch. That’s the difference between analytical
thinkers and others: they test their hunches with data and analysis.
The most important thing in the problem recognition stage is to
fully understand what the problem is and why it matters. The answers
to these two questions not only make it clear what can be accomplished by solving the problem, but also facilitate the ensuing stages.
Identifying the Stakeholders for the Analysis
Perhaps obviously, the individuals involved at this step are primarily
managers and decision makers—the “owners” of the business or organizational problem. However, even at this stage their efforts can be
greatly aided by the presence of experienced quantitative analysts
who understand the business problem, the decision process, and the
likely quantitative approaches to be employed. If all of that knowledge can’t be found within one person, you may need a team that
jointly possesses it.
It’s worth some serious thinking at this step about who the stakeholders are for the analysis you plan to undertake, and how they’re
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Stakeholder Analysis Worksheet
If you can’t answer most of these questions with a “yes,” your project may be in trouble from the beginning:
1. Is it clear what executives have a stake in the success of your
quantitative analysis project?
2. Have they been briefed on the problem and the outlines of the
3. Do they have the ability to provide the necessary resources
and to bring about the business changes needed to make the
project successful?
4. Do they generally support the use of analytics and data for
decision making?
5. Does the proposed analytical story and method of communicating it coincide with their typical way of thinking and
6. Do you have a plan for providing regular feedback and interim
results to them?
feeling about the problem (see the “Stakeholder Analysis Worksheet”). Do you have stakeholders who can take action on the results? Are they feeling skeptical that the problem even exists? Are
they likely to be persuaded to do something even if the analysis is
The tendency of analysts is often to jump right into the analysis
without thinking of stakeholders. The more confident they are in
their analytical skills, the less they may worry about who will
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 27
ultimately be the audience for the results and the “deciders” about
whether to take action.
If you’re persuaded of the need for stakeholder management for
your analytical project, some of the common steps involved in that
process include:
1. Identifying all stakeholders
2. Documenting stakeholders needs
3. Assessing and analyzing stakeholders interest/influence
4. Managing stakeholders expectations
5. Taking actions
6. Reviewing status and repeating1
A stakeholder analysis can identify who are the primary decision
makers, and how they are most likely to be persuaded by the results
from the analysis. Even the most rigorous and bulletproof analysis
approach will be of little use if it does not persuade a decision maker
to act. In fact, it may even make sense to use a questionable approach
from a methodological standpoint if that is the only evidence a decision maker will trust.
For example, Rob Duboff runs a marketing research and strategy
firm called HawkPartners. In general, he believes in the value of quantitative research whenever possible. However, he has learned that
some executives don’t understand quantitative approaches to learning customer wants and needs, and believe much more in qualitative
approaches such as focus groups—convening a small group of customers or potential customers, asking them what they think about a
company’s products and services, and observing and recording their
responses. Now Duboff knows that focus groups are methodologically
suspect. It’s pretty well known in the marketing research field that
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
customers are likely to tell you what you want to hear, and the fact that
they say they like something doesn’t mean they would actually buy it.
These problems can be mitigated by a skillful discussion leader, but
focus group results are not projectable to a wider universe. However,
Duboff feels that any research is better than none, and if evidence
from a focus group would be trusted and acted on by an executive—and
more quantitative results would not—he conducts the focus group.
In a similar sense, the stakeholders for the decision can help to determine the form of output and results presentation. Humans differ
in their preferences for seeing quantitative results; some prefer rows
and columns of numbers, some prefer graphics, and some prefer text
describing the numbers. It’s important to elicit those preferences at
a relatively early stage. If the results are going to be used not by humans but by a computer—and this is increasingly the case as more
and more decisions are automated or partially automated—then it
makes little sense to deliberate over the ideal visual format. Just feed
it the numbers it thrives on!
It may also be the case that certain analytical approaches can help to
involve stakeholders throughout the analysis. For example, at Cisco
Systems, a forecasting project addressed the possibility that substantially more accurate forecasts were possible through statistical methods (we’ll describe the six steps for this example at the end of chapter 7).
Some Cisco managers were supportive of the project, but others
doubted that better forecasts were possible. Anne Robinson, who managed the project, employed an “agile” methodology for the project, creating new deliverables every few weeks and presenting them to project
stakeholders. The more incremental approach to solving the problem
helped stakeholders buy into the new approach. Eventually it became
clear to even the skeptical managers that the new forecasting approach
was far more accurate and could be done more quickly and for more
products than the previous nonanalytical approach.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 29
Focusing on Decisions
We have found it helpful in the problem-recognition stage to focus
on specific decisions that will be made as a result of the analysis.
There are many reasons for this focus. One key reason is that a decision focus makes all participants realize that that is the reason for
the quantitative analysis; it’s not an idle exercise. Another is that focusing on the decision to be made will help to identify a key stakeholder: the person or group that will make a decision based on the
analysis. A third key reason is that if there are no decisions envisioned, it may not be worth doing the analysis.
For example, Mike Thompson, the head of First Analytics, an analytics services firm, describes a meeting he had with a client at the
problem-recognition stage. The client, a restaurant chain, believed
that the primary focus of the analysis was product profitability.
Client executives wanted First Analytics to determine how profitable each menu item was. Mike also subscribes to the idea of focusing on decisions, so he asked the client managers what decisions they
would make as a result of the profitability analyses. There was a long
silence. One executive suggested that the primary decision would be
whether to keep items on the menu or not. Another pointed out,
however, that the chain had not eliminated a single menu item over
the past twenty years. After some further discussion, the client team
decided that perhaps the focus of analysis should be menu item pricing, rather than profitability. “We have changed prices since our
founding,” one executive observed.
What Type of Analytical Story Are You Telling?
Once you’ve decided what decisions you are going to make, you can
begin to think about how you are going to provide answers or insights
for that decision. We’ll talk in chapter 4 about telling a story with
data, which is the best way to communicate results to nonanalytical
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
people. At this point, you need to begin thinking about what kind of
story it is and how you will tell it, although many of the details of the
story will come later in the analysis process. Stories are, of course,
how numbers talk to people. There are at least six types of quantitative analytical stories; each of them is described below, along with an
example or two.
THE CSI STORY. Some quantitative analyses are like police procedural television programs; they attempt to solve a business problem
with quantitative analysis. Some operational problem crops up, and
data are used to confirm the nature of the issue and find the solution.
This situation often does not require deep statistical analysis, just
good data and reporting approaches. It is often encountered in online businesses, where customer clickstreams provide plenty of
data—often too much—for analysis.
One expert practitioner of the CSI story approach is Joe Megibow,
vice president and general manager of online travel company Expedia’s US business. Joe was previously a Web analytics maven—and he
still is—but his data-based problem-solving approaches have led to a
variety of impressive promotions.
Many of the Expedia investigations involve understanding the
reasons behind lost online sales. One particular CSI story involved
lost revenue on hotel payment transactions. Analysis of data suggested that after a customer had selected a hotel, filled in the travel
and billing information, then clicked the “Buy Now” button, a percentage of the sales transactions were not being completed successfully. Megibow’s team investigated the reason for the failures, again
using Web metrics data and server log files throughout the process.
Apparently, the “Company” field under the customer’s name was
causing a problem. Some customers interpreted it as the name of the
bank that supplied their credit card, and then they also supplied the
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 31
bank’s address in the billing address fields. This caused the transaction to fail with the credit card processor. Simply removing the
“Company” field immediately raised profits for Expedia by $12 million. Megibow says that Expedia has explored many of these CSI-like
stories, and they almost always yield substantial financial or operational benefits.
Sometimes the CSI stories do involve deeper quantitative and statistical analysis. One member of Megibow’s team was investigating
which customer touchpoints were driving online sales transactions.
The analyst used the Cox regression model—an approach originally
used to determine which patients would die and which would live
over certain time periods—of “survival analysis.” The analysis discovered that the simpler prior models were not at all correct about
what marketing approaches were really leading to a sale. Megibow
commented, “We didn’t know we were leaving money on the table.”2
THE EUREKA STORY. The Eureka story is similar to the CSI story,
except that it typically involves a purposeful approach to a particular
problem (as opposed to stumbling over the problem) to examine a
major change in an organization’s strategy or business model. It
tends to be a longer story with a greater degree of analysis over time.
Sometimes Eureka stories also involve other analytical story types,
just because the results are so important to the organizations pursuing them.
At Expedia again, for example, one Eureka story involved eliminating change/cancel fees from online hotel, cruise, and car rental
reservations. Until 2009, Expedia and its competitors all charged up
to $30 for a change or cancellation—above and beyond the penalties
the hotel imposed. Expedia and other online bookers’ rates were typically much lower than booking directly with a hotel, and customers
were willing to tolerate change/cancel fees.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
However, by 2009 it had become apparent that the fees had become a liability. Expedia’s rates were closer to those of the hotels’ own
rates, so the primary appeal of Expedia had become convenience—
and change/cancel fees were not convenient. Analysts looked at
customer satisfaction rates, and they were particularly low for customers who had to pay the fees. Expedia’s call center representatives
were authorized to waive the change/cancel fees for only one reason:
a death in the customer’s family. A look at the number of waivers
showed double-digit growth for the past three years. Either there
was a death epidemic, or customers had figured out they could get
their money back this way.
Expedia executives realized the market had changed, but change/
cancel fees represented a substantial source of revenue. They wondered if the fees were eliminated, would conversion (completed sale)
rates go up? In April of 2009, they announced a temporary waiver of
fees for the month (a bit of a mad scientist testing story, described
below). Conversion rates immediately rose substantially. Executives
felt that they had enough evidence to discontinue the fees, and the
rest of the industry followed suit.
Across town in Seattle lies Zillow, a company that distributes
information about residential real estate. Zillow is perhaps best
known to quant jocks for its “Zestimates,” a proprietary algorithm that generates estimates of home values. But, like Expedia,
Zillow’s entire culture is based on data and analysis—not surprisingly, since the company was founded by Rich Barton, who also
founded Expedia.
One of Zillow’s Eureka stories involved a big decision to change
how it made its money from relationships with real estate agents.
Zillow began to work with agents in 2008, having previously been focused on consumers. One aspect of its agent-related business model
was selling advertising by agents and delivering leads to them. Zillow
charged the agents for the leads, but the value per lead was not
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 33
enough in the view of executives. Chloe Harford, a Zillow executive
who heads product management and strategy, was particularly focused on figuring out the right model for increasing lead value and
optimizing the pricing of leads.
Harford, who has a PhD in volcanology, or the study of volcanoes,
is capable of some pretty sophisticated mathematical analysis. However, she and her colleagues initially relied on what she calls “napkin
math” to explore other ways to generate more leads and price
them fairly to agents. In April 2010, Zillow created a new feature—
immediately copied by competitors—involving selling advertising
to agents. It created many more customer contacts than before, and
allowed the consumer to contact the agent directly. Zillow also introduced a sophisticated algorithm for pricing leads to agents that attempts to calculate the economic value of the lead, with an estimate
of conversion rates. Competitors also do this to some degree, but
probably not to the level of sophistication that Zillow does. The leads
and pricing of them are so important that Harford and her colleagues
frequently test different approaches of them with some of the Mad
Scientist testing approaches described below. In short, Zillow’s Eureka stories are intimately tied into its business model and its business success.
THE MAD SCIENTIST STORY. We’re all familiar with the use of scientific testing in science-based industries such as pharmaceuticals.
Drug companies test their products on a group of test subjects, while
giving a placebo to members of a control group. They pay careful
attention to ensure that people are randomly assigned to either
the test or control group, so there are no major differences between
the groups that might impact the drug’s effectiveness. It’s a powerful analytical tool because it’s usually as close as we can come to
causation—the knowledge that what is being tested in the test group
is driving the outcome in a causal fashion.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Rigorous testing is no longer just the province of white-coated scientists; it is now an analytical approach that every large organization
can employ. There is broadly available software that leads managers
or analysts through the testing process. Companies can now base important decisions on real, scientifically valid experiments. In the
past, any foray into randomized testing (the random assignment to
groups that we mentioned above) meant employing or engaging a
PhD in statistics or a “design of experiments” expert. Now, a quantitatively trained MBA can oversee the process, assisted by software
that will help determine what sizes of groups are necessary, which
sites to use for testing and controls, and whether any changes resulting from experiments are statistically significant.
The mad scientist stories are particularly well suited to organizations like retailers (that have a lot of stores) and banks (that have a
lot of branches). That makes it easy to try things out in some locations and use others as controls. It’s also quite easy to do testing on
websites, where you can send some customers to one version of a
Web page, send other customers to a different version, and see if the
results are significantly different (called A/B testing in the Web analytics field).
Some examples of mad scientist stories include:3
• Do lobster tanks sell more lobsters at Food Lion supermarkets?
The answer is apparently yes if the store was one in which
customers already bought lobsters (i.e., they were relatively
upscale), and no if the store didn’t attract lobster-buying
customers to begin with.
• Does a Sears store inside a Kmart sell more than all-Kmart?
Sears Holdings chairman Eddie Lampert is a big fan of
randomized testing and has tested a variety of such
combinations. We don’t know the answer to this particular
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 35
question, but we’re guessing that if the answer were a definitive
yes, we would have seen a lot more of these blended stores.
• Are the best sales results at the Red Lobster seafood restaurant
chain achieved from a low-, medium-, or high-cost remodel of
restaurants—and should the exterior or the interior be the
primary focus? The result, according to Red Lobster executives,
was that the medium-cost interior remodel paid off best.
Exterior remodels brought a lot of new customers in, but if
they saw that the interiors hadn’t been redone as well, they
didn’t come back.
THE SURVEY STORY. Surveys are a classic method of quantitative
research. The survey analyst observes phenomena that have already
happened or are happening now. The analyst doesn’t try to manipulate the outcome—only to observe, codify, and analyze it. Typically
the surveyor seeks to understand what traits or variables observed
in the survey are statistically related to other traits. The simplest
example would be if we asked a sample of customers of a particular
product various things about themselves, including demographic information like gender and age. If we also asked what products they
liked, we could then determine whether men like certain products
more than women, or whether certain products are more likely to be
liked by younger people.
Surveys are popular and relatively easy to carry out. However, we
have to remember that the results and stories based on them can
vary considerably based on how questions are asked and how they
vary (or not) over time. For example, the US Census has worked for
literally decades on questions about the race of US citizens. The
number of racial categories in census surveys keeps expanding; in
the 2010 census there were fifteen choices, including “some other
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
race.” That was a popular choice for the more than 50 million Latino
US citizens, 18 million of whom checked the “Other” box.4 If there is
that much confusion about race, imagine what difficulties survey researchers can have with slippery topics such as politics, religion, social attitudes, and sexual behavior.
We also have to remember that just because two variables in a survey analysis are related, they may not be causally related. We’ll have
more to say about this issue in chapter 6, but for now we’ll just point
out that there may well be other variables that you’re not looking at
that might be the causal factor driving the phenomena you care about.
Survey stories often involve asking people about their beliefs and
attitudes, but they don’t have to involve people. Take, for example,
this survey of airplanes conducted during World War II, related in a
classic statistics textbook:
During the Second World War it was necessary to keep planes
in action as much as possible, so it was decided to see if the
number of time-consuming engine overhauls could be reduced
without risk. A retrospective survey was made of planes that
were lost, and contrary to all expectations, it was found that
the number of planes lost as a result of engine troubles was
greatest right after overhaul, and actually decreased as the
time since overhaul grew longer. This result led to a considerable increase in the intervals between overhauls, and needless
to say, to important revisions in the manner of overhauling to
make sure that all those nuts and bolts were really tightened
up properly.5
If you’re planning to do or analyze a survey, make sure that you’ve
thought very carefully about the meanings of your survey questions or variables. A variable is any measured characteristic, with
two or more levels or values, of properties of people, situations, and
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 37
behaviors. Gender, test scores, room temperature, love, happiness,
and team cohesiveness are good examples of variables.
Also, it’s important to ensure that your survey sample is representative of the population you want to study. How you perform the
survey can affect the sample. For example, if you want to survey
young people’s attitudes or behaviors, don’t hire a survey firm that
only contacts the members of the sample through landline telephones. That’s a very typical approach, but we all know that many
young people don’t have, and don’t ever intend to have, a landline.
So they would be underrepresented in a sample that employs only
THE PREDICTION STORY. Prediction stories are all about anticipating what will happen in the future. While it’s pretty difficult to get
good data about the future, taking data about the past and understanding the factors that drive past events is pretty straightforward
for quantitative analytics. Typically this is referred to as predictive
analytics or predictive modeling.
There are a variety of prediction stories that an analyst can construct. Below is a sample of possibilities; note how specific they are:
• Offer response: Which customers will respond to an e-mail of a
free shipping offer within two business days with a
purchase of $50 or more?
• Cross-sell/upsell: Which checking account customers with
account balances over $2,000 will purchase a one-year CD
with an interest rate of 1.5 percent, responding within one
month, given a mail solicitation?
• Employee attrition: Which employees of more than six months
who haven’t yet signed up for the 401(k) program will resign
from their jobs within the next three months?
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
There are many other predictive analytics possibilities. In business, a common approach to prediction is to determine what offer
the customer is most likely to accept. The most sophisticated versions of this “next best offer” analytics are increasingly automated;
no human needs to see the offer before it is made available to the customer, and there can be hundreds or thousands of different offers.
Microsoft, for example, has an incredible ability to dynamically
tailor “offers” for its Bing search engine (the product is free, so Microsoft is just trying to get you to use it). The offers tempt you to try
out Bing, to create a Bing search bar on your browser, to try a particular Bing feature, and so forth. The customization of the offer is
based on a variety of factors—including your location, age, gender,
and recent online activity—that it can determine from your cookies
and other sources. If you have signed up for Microsoft Passport, the
company has even more information about you that allows for targeting the offers even more effectively. Microsoft is able (facilitated
by the Infor Epiphany Interaction Advisor software they use) to instantly compose a targeted e-mail the moment you click on an offer
in your inbox; it all takes about 200 milliseconds. Microsoft says it
works extremely well to lift conversion rates.
Often, prediction stories can be a bit of a fishing expedition. We
don’t know exactly what factors will allow us to predict something,
so we try a lot of them and see what works. Sometimes the results are
unexpected. For example, in the Microsoft Bing offers we’ve just described, the number of Microsoft Messenger buddies you have turns
out to be a good predictor of whether you’ll try out Bing.
At Google, the company wanted to predict what employee traits
predicted high performance. Some analysis determined that the factors Google was originally using—grades in college and interview
ratings—were poor predictors of performance. Since they weren’t
sure what factors would be important, they asked employees to
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 39
answer a three-hundred-question survey. As Laszlo Bock, the head
of People Operations at Google, noted: “We wanted to cast a very wide
net. It is not unusual to walk the halls here and bump into dogs. Maybe
people who own dogs have some personality trait that is useful.”7
Bringing pets to work didn’t prove to predict much of anything,
but Google did find some unexpected predictors. For example, whether
a job applicant had set a world or national record or had started a
nonprofit organization or club were both associated with high performance. Google now asks questions about experiences like these
on its online job interviews.
Of course, if the factors that predict something make no sense at
all, it’s a good idea to go back and recheck your data and your analysis. But actually looking at some data can outperform a human futurist’s predictions much of the time. As a caution, remember that
predictive stories use data from the past to tell stories about the future. If something in the world has changed since you did your analysis, the predictions may no longer hold.
THE “HERE’S WHAT HAPPENED” STORY. Stories that simply tell
what happened using data are perhaps the most common of all. They
provide the facts—how many products were sold when and where,
what were the financials that were achieved last quarter, how many
people did we hire last year. Since they are reporting-oriented stories that often don’t use sophisticated math, it might seem that they
would be easy to tell. However, the great rise in data within today’s
organizations has been mirrored by a similar rise in reports based on
data. Therefore, it’s sometimes difficult to get the attention of the intended audience for the reports you create or distribute.
This type of story is particularly well suited to visual displays of
information. Suffice it to say that if you are providing reports in rows
and columns of numbers, you aren’t likely to get the attention you
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
need. Many of us even tire today of colorful graphs and charts, but
most people would say they are more worthy of attention than numbers on a page. Since chapter 4 is about communicating results, we’ll
say more about how to make this kind of report more interesting and
attention-getting there.
The Scope of the Problem
By definition, a data-driven story and the quantitative analysis behind it can be somewhat narrow in scope, simply because it requires
gathering data and applying it to a testable hypothesis (see
“Examples of Testable Hypotheses”). It’s difficult to gather data on
very broad problems. However, it’s important at this step not to prematurely limit the scope of the problem or decision. Thinking about
the issue should be expansive, and you should have a number of alternative directions in mind. For example, if an organization recognizes a performance problem within a particular business unit or
region, it should be open to a variety of causes of the problem—from
customer dissatisfaction to operational issues to problems with
products or services.
In the example of Transitions Optical at the end of this chapter,
the problem recognition and framing step was prompted by a vague
sense that marketing spending was too high, but the decision frame
was expanded into one involving an overall optimization of marketing spending levels and media used.
We’ve referred to this first step in quantitative analysis as problem recognition, but it can also be an identification of opportunities.
Joseph Jagger (1830–1892), a British engineer, realized that there
was an opportunity to “break the bank” at the Monte Carlo casino.8
Jagger gained his practical experience of mechanics working in
Yorkshire’s cotton manufacturing industry. He extended his experience to the behavior of a roulette wheel, speculating that its outcomes
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 41
Examples of Testable Hypotheses
• The type of products that a customer has bought from us in the
past year is the best guide to what e-mailed offers he or she will
respond positively to in the future.
• Years of education is a good predictor of the level of performance rating an employee will receive in knowledge work jobs.
• Price markdowns of 10 percent made in the week before a holiday are less effective than those made at other periods.
• An end-cap display is the most effective placement of our product in a retail store for lifting weekly sales.
• Our customers can be grouped into four distinct segments with
regard to the products they buy.
• Our ability to raise prices on a class of consumer staple products without hurting demand is significantly lower during economic recessions.
• Our business units that have centralized inventory management
facilities tend to maintain lower average days of inventory for
their production processes.
were not purely random sequences but that mechanical imbalances
might result in biases toward particular outcomes. What if there
were imperfections in the roulette wheel that he could exploit to his
advantage? He went to Monaco to test this concept.
There are thirty-seven numbers in a French/European roulette
wheel: 1–36 and 0. When a wheel is spun once, the theoretical probability that each number will come out is equal to 1/37. Therefore the
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
proportion of each resultant number in a large number of spins
should be roughly 1/37. Jagger speculated that mechanical imbalances, if any, in wheels would cause specific numbers to appear more
often than the probability of 1/37.
With these thoughts in mind, Jagger hired six clerks to observe
the six roulette wheels at the legendary Beaux-Arts Casino in Monte
Carlo, each covering a different wheel. Each had specific instructions to record all of the results that came from each spin. When he
analyzed the results, Jagger found that five of the roulette wheels
produced the random results that one would expect. On the sixth
wheel, however, he found that nine particular numbers (7, 8, 9, 17, 18,
19, 22, 28, and 29) appeared more often than mere chance could account for. Jagger concluded that the wheel was biased—that is, imperfectly balanced. He accordingly placed his first bets on July 7,
1875, and quickly won a considerable amount of money (£14,000—
equivalent to around sixty times that amount in 2012, or over $1.3
million, adjusted for inflation). The casino caught on to Jagger’s betting strategy, and eventually neutralized it—but not before he had
won the current equivalent of over $6 million. Quite an analytical
Getting Specific About What You Want to Find Out
While it’s important to think expansively early in the problem recognition step, by the end of it you’ll need to have created a clear statement of the problem, with concrete definitions of the key items or
variables you want to study. Here’s why: it makes a big difference how
things are defined in quantitative research. For example, let’s say you
were a television executive interested in learning what channels
consumers watched. Two different analytical consultants have approached you with proposals to learn the answer. Just for fun you decide to hire both of them to see how their results compare.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 43
One consultant proposes to ask consumers to record (using either
an online or a paper form) the actual channels and programs watched
each day for a week. The other suggests asking the survey respondents to rank the channels they generally watch on television over
the last several months. Both have well-designed survey samples
that represent the desired population.
While these two consultants are trying to solve very similar problems, they are likely to come back with very different results. The one
who proposes that consumers record actual programs and channels
watched each day is likely to get more accurate results, but the extra
burden of recording is likely to mean a lower level of participation
from the survey sample. (Nielsen Media Research, which does channel and program monitoring on an ongoing basis, has about a 50 percent dropout level, and its recording is automated.) The other
problem with this consultant is that viewing patterns might be
overly influenced by the particular season or programming offered
during the particular week of the study.
The other study is likely to be less accurate, but since it covers a
broader time period, it is less likely to be influenced by seasonal factors. Most importantly, the results of the two surveys will probably
be so different as to be difficult to reconcile. That’s why it’s important
to finish the problem recognition step with a clear idea about what
you want to study.
Review of Previous Findings Step
Once the problem is recognized, all the previous findings connected
to it should be investigated. This is still a step within the first stage of
analysis (framing the problem) because investigating previous findings can help analysts and decision makers think about how the
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
problem has been structured
thus far, and how it might be
conceptualized in different ways.
Quite often, analysts will discover
something in the review of previous findings that will lead to a
substantial revision of the problem recognition step. That in turn
can lead to a different set of previous findings.
Basically at this step we are asking, “Has a story similar to this
been told before?” If so, we can get ideas for our own analysis. The review of previous findings can suggest any of the following:
• What kind of story could we tell? Does it involve prediction,
reporting, an experiment, a survey?
• What kind of data are we likely to want to look for?
• How have variables been defined before?
• What types of analyses are we likely to perform?
• How could we tell the story in an interesting way that is likely
to get results, and different from past stories?
One of the key attributes of quantitative analysis (and of the scientific method more broadly) is that it draws on previous research
and findings. For example, searching thorough the problem-related
knowledge appearing in books, reports, and articles is very important in getting to the bottom of the problem. It may help to identify relevant variables and any association among the identified
2. Review of previous findings
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 45
A complete review of any of the previous findings is a must in any
given quantitative analysis. You cannot make something out of
nothing in analytics. You may only begin to solve the problem once
you have a total grasp of the previous findings. Just remember one
thing: your problem is not as unique as you think, and it’s likely that
many people have already done just what you are trying to do. Do
not reinvent the wheel; what you need to do is search, search, and
search again. These days, by using a search engine like Google, you
can easily muster up most of the material related to your issue. By
just arranging and evaluating the material, you can identify a potential model or approach to solve the problem.
An example of a successful review of previous findings took place
during World War II. Adolf Hitler had ordered the production of a
powerful new rocket bomb called the V-2, and in 1944 the Luftwaffe
began to terrify the citizens of London. Over the next few months,
1,358 V-2s, out of at least 3,172 rockets distributed over the various
Allied targets, flew out of the sky and landed in London, resulting in
the death of an estimated 7,250 military personnel and civilians.
During the attack on London, many observers asserted that the
points of impact of the bombs were grouped in clusters. The British
were interested in knowing whether the Germans could actually target their bomb hits or were merely limited to random hits. If the Germans could only randomly hit targets, then deployment throughout
the countryside of various security installations would serve quite
well to protect the nation. But if the Germans could actually target
their bombs, then the British were faced with a more potent opponent; the deployment of security installations would do little to protect them. The British government engaged statistician R. D. Clarke
to solve this question. Clarke applied a simple statistical test based
on his review—or existing knowledge—of previous findings.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Clarke was aware that the Poisson distribution could be used to analyze the distribution of bombs. The Poisson distribution expresses
the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed period of
time, area, or volume if these events occur with a known average
rate. The only thing we have to know to specify the Poisson distribution is the mean number of occurrences. If the bombs are falling randomly, the number of bombs that hit any particular small area
follows a Poisson distribution. For example, if the average number of
bombs that hit is 1 bomb per area, we can easily calculate the probabilities that no bomb will hit, exactly 1 bomb will hit, exactly 2 bombs
will hit, exactly 3 bombs will hit, and exactly 4 or more bombs will
hit, just by plugging these numbers in the Poisson formula.
To measure the number of bombs that may hit any specifically defined small area, Clarke divided South London into 576 squares of
one-quarter square kilometer each, and counted the numbers of
squares containing 0, 1, 2, 3, etc., flying bombs. If the targeting was
completely random, then the probability that a square is hit with 0, 1,
2, 3, etc., hits would be governed by a Poisson distribution. The actual
fit of the Poisson pattern for the data was surprisingly good, which
lent no support to the clustering hypothesis (see the website for this
book). The British were relieved by Clarke’s conclusion. Fortunately,
the Germans surrendered in 1945 before the V-2 could do much
more damage. (Note: Despite its inability to be guided effectively,
that rocket became the technical basis of the US space program.)
Just as Clarke did when he realized that the problem of the falling
bombs could be described by a Poisson distribution, you can go back
and review the problem recognition step after you have reviewed
previous findings (see “Some Methods for Reviewing Previous Findings”). You may find that you need to modify your story, your problem scope, your decision, or even your stakeholders. If you have
revised those a bit, or if you’re still happy with the original problem
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 47
Some Methods for Reviewing Previous Findings
• Do an Internet search for key terms related to your analysis.
• Consult a statistics textbook for analyses similar to the one
you’re proposing.
• Talk to analysts around your company to see if they’ve done
something similar.
• Check your company’s knowledge management system if it has
• Talk about the problem with analysts at other (but noncompetitive) companies.
• Attend a conference (or at least look online at conference agendas) on analytics to see if anyone else is presenting on related
definition, you can consider your problem framed and move along to
actually solving it using quantitative analysis.
Reframing the Problem
Although we’ve laid out the analytical problem-solving process as a
linear one of six steps in three stages, it is nothing if not iterative.
Every step sheds new light on the problem, and it’s always a good idea
to think about how the new knowledge might shed light on previous
steps. Although you can’t spend forever reexamining each step, it’s
worth some time thinking about what the review of previous findings suggests about framing the problem (the “Worksheet for Framing the Problem” can help).
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Worksheet for Framing the Problem
Have you framed the problem well? If so, you should be able to answer all or most of these questions positively:
1. Have you defined a clear problem or opportunity to address
what is important to your business or organization?
2. Have you considered multiple alternative ways to solve the
3. Have you identified the stakeholders for the problem, and
communicated with them extensively about it?
4. Are you confident that the way you plan to solve the problem
will resonate with the stakeholders, and that they will use the
results to make a decision?
5. Are you clear on what decision is to be made—and who will
make it—on the basis of the results from your analysis once
the problem is solved?
6. Have you started with a broad definition of the problem, but
then narrowed it down to a very specific problem with clear
phrasing on the question to be addressed, the data to be applied to it, and the possible outcomes?
7. Are you able to describe the type of analytical story that
you want to tell in solving this particular problem?
8. Do you have someone who can help you in solving that
particular type of analytical story?
9. Have you looked systematically to see whether there
are previous findings or experience related to this problem
either within or outside your organization?
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 49
10. Have you revised your problem definition based on
what you have learned from your review of previous
For a good example, Rama Ramakrishnan, a retail analytics expert
who is now CEO of the start-up CQuotient, describes a situation
suitable for reframing in one of his blog posts:9
Take the “customer targeting” problem that arises in direct
marketing. Customer targeting is about deciding which
customers should be mailed (since mailing every customer is
expensive). This is an old problem that has been studied by
numerous researchers and practitioners. The most commonly
used approach is as follows:
1. send a test mailing to a sample of customers
2. use the results of the test mailing to build a “response
model” that predicts each customer’s propensity to
respond to the mailing as a function of their attributes,
past history etc.
3. use this model to score each customer in the database and
mail to the top scorers.
This looks reasonable and may well be what the business
cares about. But perhaps not.
The words “response model” suggest that the mailing caused
the customer to respond. In reality, the customer may have
come into the store and made a purchase anyway (I am thinking
of multichannel retailers and not pure-play catalog retailers.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
For the latter, without the catalog, it may be impossible for
customers to make a purchase so the word “response” may be
What these response models really do is identify customers
who are likely to shop rather than customers likely to shop as a
result of the mailing. But maybe what management really
wants is the latter. For those customers who are either going
to shop anyway or not going to shop regardless of what is
mailed to them, mailing is a waste of money and potentially
costs customer goodwill too. What the business may really
want is to identify those customers who will shop if mailed,
but won’t if not mailed.
This re-framing of the customer targeting problem and approaches for solving it are relatively recent. It goes by many
names—uplift modeling, net lift modeling—and the academic
work on it is quite minimal compared to traditional response
modeling. Yet, for many retailers, this is a more relevant and
useful way to frame and solve the customer targeting problem
than doing it the old way.
In this example, a thorough review of previous findings might
have revealed the recent work on uplift and net lift modeling, and
that might occasion a reframing of the problem. Ramakrishnan
suggests that in such situations with relatively new modeling approaches, “Since the new problem hasn’t received enough attention (by definition), simple algorithms may yield benefits quickly.”
We’ll conclude this chapter on framing the problem with a couple of
examples, one from business and one from law, in which the framing
process was critical to the outcome. One is a good example of framing, and one is an example of incorrect framing. You haven’t learned
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 51
much yet about the steps beyond the framing stage, but we’re confident that you can make sense of them in these examples.
Analytical Thinking Example: Transitions Optical
One of the most common analytical problems in business is deciding
how much to spend on a specific activity. And that’s a particularly difficult decision for marketing spending. The department store founder
John Wanamaker—and some European retailers before him—are
renowned for saying, “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted;
the trouble is I don’t know which half.” Today, however, companies can
use quantitative analysis to find out which marketing expenditures are
effective, and which are not—and what the most effective combination
of marketing expenditures is. This is typically called marketing mix
analysis, and it’s increasingly popular for firms that sell to consumers.
offers photochromic lenses for glasses, was getting some pressure
from its corporate parents (Transitions is jointly owned by PPG and
Essilor) with regard to its level of marketing spending. PPG, in particular, isn’t in the business of consumer marketing, so that parent was
especially skeptical about the cost and value of advertising and promotion. There were specific questions about whether particular advertising and marketing campaigns were effective or not. The overall
intuitive feeling was that spending was too high, but there was no empirical data to answer the question of what level of marketing spend
was optimal. Transitions executives decided to frame the problem as
one of optimizing marketing expenditures and approaches in a way
that maximized sales lift for the dollars invested. According to Grady
Lenski, who headed Marketing at the time, “We were relying heavily
on art to make marketing decisions; we needed more science.”
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
REVIEW OF PREVIOUS FINDINGS. No previous findings on this
topic existed; Transitions had customer data that would make such
an analysis possible, but it was fragmented across the organization.
Lenski and some of his colleagues were aware that it was possible to
analyze the effectiveness of different marketing approaches, but
didn’t know the details.
MODELING (VARIABLE SELECTION). Marketing mix optimization
models, which are increasingly employed by large organizations to
optimize marketing spending, involve variables of marketing response, marketing costs, and product margins. The optimization
models, using linear and nonlinear programming methods, find the
weekly or monthly advertising, promotion, and pricing levels that
maximize revenue, profit margin, or both. They also determine
which particular advertising media are most effective for maximizing these outcomes. They also typically contain a series of “control”
variables that might affect consumer spending and purchase behavior, such as weather and macroeconomic data.
DATA COLLECTION. This was one of the most difficult aspects of the
analysis for Transitions, since the company works with intermediaries (optical labs, for example) and historically had little contact
with or data about end customers. Hence, it couldn’t accurately measure whether advertisements were seen by customers or whether
they provided any sales lift. Transitions embarked upon a multiyear
effort to gather end customer data from its channel partners (some of
whom were competitors of its parent companies). Lenski had previously been head of the retail channel, so that facilitated gathering the
information. The customer information came into Transitions in
thirty different formats, but the company was eventually able to get it
into an integrated data warehouse for analysis. Lenski commented
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 53
that the Marketing organization also needed to persuade different
parts of the Transitions organization to provide data. The first time
Transitions did the analysis, it did so without a data warehouse.
DATA ANALYSIS. Transitions hired an external consultant to do the
data analysis, since it had no one in-house who was familiar with marketing mix optimization models. The analysis initially took several months,
since the data had to be gathered and the model involves ruling out a wide
variety of other explanatory factors for any marketing response (including weather, competitor marketing, etc.). Now that the models have been
developed and refined, they can be finished in a few days.
RESULTS PRESENTATION AND ACTION. Transitions felt that interpreting and presenting the results was important enough to require inhouse capabilities, so internal staff were hired to do it. The in-house
experts take the model from the consultants and discuss it with executives to determine its implications and combine them with their intuitions about the market. Overall, the results have led to higher spending
on marketing for Transitions, particularly for television advertising.
Analytical Thinking Example: People v. Collins
People v. Collinswas a jury trial in California that made notorious forensic use of mathematics and probability, and it’s a good example of how
framing the problem incorrectly can lead to a bad outcome.10 The jury
found defendant Malcolm Collins and his wife, Janet Collins, guilty of
second-degree robbery. Malcolm appealed the judgment, and the
Supreme Court of California eventually set aside the conviction, criticizing the statistical reasoning and disallowing the way the decision was
put to the jury. We will examine this case within the six-step framework.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
PROBLEM RECOGNITION. Mrs. Juanita Brooks, who had been shopping, was walking home along an alley in the San Pedro area. She was
suddenly pushed to the ground by a person whom she couldn’t see. She
was stunned by the fall and felt some pain. Immediately after the incident, Mrs. Brooks discovered that her purse, containing between $35
and $40, was missing. A witness to the robbery testified that the perpetrators were a black male with a beard and moustache, and a Caucasian
female with blonde hair tied in a ponytail. They had escaped in a yellow
car. At the seven-day trial, the prosecution experienced some difficulty
in establishing the identities of the perpetrators of the crime. The victim could not identify Janet Collins and had never seen her assailant;
identification by the witness was incomplete. The prosecutor—perhaps
desperate to save the case—decided to help the jury determine the
probability that the accused pair fit the description of the witnesses.
REVIEW OF PREVIOUS FINDINGS. It is recognized that the court
generally discerns no inherent incompatibility between the disciplines of law and mathematics and intends no disapproval or disparagement of mathematics as a fact-finding process of the law. There
have been some criminal cases in which the prosecution used mathematical probability as evidence.
MODELING (VARIABLE SELECTION). The model suggested by the
prosecutor is the probability that the accused pair fits the description of the witnesses.
DATA COLLECTION (MEASUREMENT). The prosecutor called to the
stand an instructor of mathematics at a state college. Through this
witness, he suggested that the jury would be safe in estimating the
following probabilities of encountering the attributes of the criminals and crime:
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Framing the Problem 55
Black man with beard 1 in 10
Man with moustache 1 in 4
White woman with pony tail 1 in 10
White woman with blonde hair 1 in 3
Yellow motor car 1 in 10
Interracial couple in car 1 in 1,000
DATA ANALYSIS. The mathematics instructor suggested that when
events are independent, the probabilities of their happening together can be computed by multiplying each probability.
P(A) the probability that the accused pair fits
the description of the witness
RESULTS PRESENTATION AND ACTION. The prosecutor arrived at
a probability that there was only one chance in 12 million that any
couple possessed the distinctive characteristics of the defendants.
Accordingly, under this theory, it was to be inferred that there could
be but one chance in 12 million that the defendants were innocent.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
The Collinses appealed this judgment. The California Supreme
Court thought that undoubtedly the jurors were unduly impressed
by the mystique of the mathematical demonstration but were unable
to assess its relevancy or value. The court set aside the conviction,
criticizing the statistical reasoning and disallowing the way in which
the decision was put to the jury. The Supreme Court pointed out that
= 1
12,000,000, or one in 12 million
= 1
10 * 1
4 * 1
10 * 1
3 * 1
10 * 1
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
the specific technique presented through the mathematician’s testimony suffered from two important defects. First, the prosecution
produced no evidence whatsoever showing the validity of the odds,
nor evidence from which such odds could be in any way inferred.
Second, there was another glaring defect in the prosecution’s technique: an inadequate proof of the statistical independence of the six
factors which were brought as evidence by the prosecution (e.g.,
bearded men commonly sport moustaches).
More importantly, the case and evidence had been framed incorrectly by the prosecutor. Even if the prosecution’s conclusion was
arithmetically accurate, it could not be concluded that the Collinses
were the guilty couple. There was absolutely no guidance on a crucial
issue: of the admittedly few such couples that might be encountered
in the world, which one, if any, was guilty of committing this
The relevant variable in this case was not the probability that the accused pair fits the description of the witnesses, but the probability that
there are other couples fitting the description of the witnesses, since
the accused pair already fit the description. Depending on exactly how
many couples there are in the Los Angeles area, the probability of at
least one other couple fitting the description might be as high as 40 percent (see the website for this book). Thus the prosecution’s computations, far from establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the
Collinses were the couple described by the prosecution’s witnesses,
imply a very substantial likelihood that the area contained more than
one such couple, and that a couple other than the Collinses was the one
observed at the scene of the robbery.
After an examination of the entire case, including the evidence,
the Supreme Court determined that the judgment against the defendants must therefore be reversed. Bad framing of problems can
clearly lead to bad decisions.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.
Chapter 2
11. S. Babou, “What Is Stakeholder Analysis?” The Project Management Hut,
12. “Expedia Travels to New Heights,” SASCom Magazine,Third Quarter 2011, 14.
13. All of these testing stories are examples from customers of Applied Predictive
Technologies, a software company, though we approached the companies independently. For more on the methods behind this approach, see Thomas H. Davenport,
“How to Design Smart Business Experiments,” Harvard Business Review, November
14. Mireya Navarro, “For Many Latinos, Race Is More Culture Than Color,” New
York Times, January 13, 2012.
15. W.A. Wallis and H.V. Roberts, Statistics: A New Approach (New York: Free
Press, 1960).
16. Lisa Carley-Baxter et al., “Comparison of Cell Phone and Landline Surveys: A
Design Perspective,” Field Methods 22, no. 1 (February 2010): 3–15.
17. Saul Hansell, “Google Answer to Filling Jobs Is an Algorithm,” New York
Times, January 3, 2007, www.nytimes.com/2007/01/03/technology/03google.html.
18. “Joseph Jagger,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Jagger;
“Joseph Jagger: The Man Who Broke the Bank,” www.wildjackcasino.com/
joseph-jagger.html; “Joseph Jagger,” www.realmoneycasinos.net/joseph-jagger.
html; “Roulette—The Men Who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo—Joseph Jagger,”
19. Rama Ramakrishnan, “Three Ways to Analytic Impact,” The Analytic Age
blog, July 26, 2011, http://blog.ramakrishnan.com/.
10. People v. Collins, 68 Cal. 2d 319 (1968); http://scholar.google.com/
scholar_case?case=2393563144534950884; “People v. Collins,” http://en.wikipedia.
This document is authorized for use only by Ayomipo Adeyemo in Healthcare Informatics at Strayer JWMI BB SaaS, 2022.

Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply

Buy Custom Essay

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Your Guide to Understanding and Using Analytics
Just from $9/Page
Order Essay

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?

  • Plagiarism free papers
  • Timely delivery
  • Any deadline
  • Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
  • Subject-relevant academic writer
  • Adherence to paper instructions
  • Ability to tackle bulk assignments
  • Reasonable prices
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Get superb grades consistently

Online Academic Help With Different Subjects


Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.


Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.

Computer science

Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!


While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.


Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.


In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.


Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.


We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!


We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.


Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.

What discipline/subjects do you deal in?

We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.

Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?

Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.

What if I don’t like the paper?

There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.

Reasons being:

  • When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
  • We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.

In the event that you don’t like your paper:

  • The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
  • We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
  • Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.

Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?

Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.

What if the paper is plagiarized?

We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.

When will I get my paper?

You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.

Will anyone find out that I used your services?

We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.

How our Assignment Help Service Works

1. Place an order

You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.

2. Pay for the order

Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.

3. Track the progress

You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.

4. Download the paper

The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.

smile and order essay GET A PERFECT SCORE!!! smile and order essay Buy Custom Essay

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
Need assignment help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp using +1 718 717 2861

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.
  +1 718 717 2861           + 44 161 818 7126           [email protected]
  +1 718 717 2861         [email protected]